What's on at Air Force Museum of New Zealand
Latest from the museum

Latest Exhibition
Tall Tails
Exhibition
The Mighty Hercules


Support Us
Home for Heroes
Birthday Parties
Mission: Best birthday ever

Our Aircraft
Explore AircraftMore to explore

Latest Exhibition
Exhibition


Support Us
Birthday Parties

More to explore
❓MYSTERY CONTROL COLUMN COMPETITION❓: This week's mystery control column competition is officially, in our opinion, extremely difficult.
All you have to do is identify which aircraft in our collection this control column (we accept joystick) belongs to.
Correct answers will go in the draw to win one of our stunning Air Force Museum of New Zealand roundel coffee mugs.
They are round, with roundels and perfect for dunking.
The very best of luck. You are going to need #MysteryObjectbj#wedonthaveacluea#ImpossiblePuzzleuzzle ... See MoreSee Less
Comment on Facebook
Yeah, no clue. I see lots of people believe it's the devon though
The control ground lock confirms it!.
Devon, the pneumatic park brake selector gives it away
de Havilland DH.104 Devon. NZ1803
The Devon. If I could smell the cockpit I'd be 100%. IYKYK.
first thought was the Devon and there are pommy instruments behind it
I once flew a DH114 and it did indeed have the “ teaspoon “ differential brake actuator and yoke just like this. So I’m going to go De Havilland DH104 just to be different 😎
Devon, I used to fly one.
differential air brakes.....devon
Dunno but it's a Pommy aeroplane and the dead give away is the brake lever on the LH control column for the joke was rudder pedals central, equal braking to both mains, rudder pedals either full left or right, braking to that main only. Usually Pom aeroplanes only had the "park" facility on the LH control column as well.
Don't know was RNZIR, never got that close to that area of the aircraft.👍♦️😳
De Havilland DH 104 Devon LH side control column (yoke).
cockpit control column from a de Havilland Devon twin-engine light transport aircraft.
Unmistakable Devon NZ1803. Spent time back in 1986-87 getting this aircraft ready for the museum.
Left side control yoke DeHavilland Devon.
Yoke of a De Havilland DH104 Devon
De Havilland DH 104 Devon NZ1803 Control Collum
DeHavilland Devon. Would you also accept “yoke”?
Dehaviland Devon.
D.H.104 Devon
de Havilland Devon
Your mum's Wolsley
Lockheed P-38 Lightning
Hmmmmm 🤔 that's the control column (yoke) of your De Havilland DH 104 Devon NZ1803
DeHaviland DH.104 Devon
View more comments
📢🚨WHOOP WHOOP - GET THE KETTLE ON - WE HAVE A WINNER!📢🚨: Come on down Ian Hocking - deserved winner of this week's mystery object competition.
The objects were indeed dip sticks for the Bristol Freighter - one for the outer tanks, one for the inner.
These high-tech pieces were not vampire stakes as one reader suggested, but this sent us on a hunt for De Havilland dip sticks as a side quest.
Ian, we hope this prized coffee mug makes your life complete!
Please email communications@airforcemuseum.co.nz and we will fire up the Auster and fly the mug out to you.
We would normally use the Freighter but fuel prices mean we've had to introduce Austerity (geddit?) measures.
A new mystery awaits next week. ... See MoreSee Less
Comment on Facebook
Awesome prize. Can we have one us Infantry boys might know the answer to,I.E. Where do we hold the Para courses at.
Thank you, I’ll drop in later today, I live just off Springs Road 😊
Got it.
Awesome congratulations to the winner
EVER WONDERED? Why did the Chance-Vought F4U-1/F4U-1D and Goodyear FG-1D Corsairs flown by the RNZAF have gull-shaped wings?
Excellent question!
In 1938 the US Navy wanted an aircraft powered by the extremely potent new Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp engine which was capable of producing 2000 horsepower.
The Navy was also keen on an aircraft capable of 640 km/h, and when they did the maths this required a propellor with a diameter of 4 metres.
To fit this massive propellor the aircraft would require tall landing gear, which was likely to be complicated and heavy, producing a lot of drag.
The engineers all got together to ponder a solution, and they came up with a bent wing design. By bending the wing, the landing gear could be kept short and the wings low, keeping drag to a minimum.
Genius.
The RNZAF thought so and there were more Corsairs in the air force than any other aircraft type. The RNZAF operated 424 Corsairs from 1944, with the last aircraft retiring in 1948.
But wait, time for one more question. Why did Goodyear, more famous for making tires, make Corsairs?
The answer is that Chance-Vought was a relatively small manufacturer and ran out of capacity to meet the huge demand for aircraft during the war years.
Goodyear had excess factory space, and manufactured Corsairs under licence.
#rnzaf #corsair ... See MoreSee Less
Comment on Facebook
Hellcat had the same engine and prop yet didn’t require an inverted gull wing. I suggest the primary reason was a reduction in intersection drag.
I always understood the reason for the Corsair wing design was exactly as the Air Force Museum describe. In these days of social media, where anyone can self-publish anything, we need to be careful about re-writing history. That includes even listening to pilots who flew them when in service. Rant over. Now I want to know, did Chance Vought get the idea from Junkers?
Agree with commentors vs OP, the gull wing was not related to landing gear clearance, but other aerodynamic, storage, and pilot visibility enhancements. Plenty of vids on the subject.
I just watched a video on this topic in the past hour by concidence and a true ww2 pilot gave an answer to this question. I am going to dispute the claims in this post and it was to stop the propeller hitting the ground. youtube.com/shorts/wpj3w_h3AmU?si=feTd_Z_hzfkAZRbh
This page is from a Vought internal newsletter during WW2. Explains their reasons.
The aspect of the pilot trying to see past the big elevated nose made it difficult and dangerous to attempt carrier landings until a clever method of approach was pioneered by pilots of the Royal Navy's Fleet Air Arm.
Awesome tutorial lesson, thank you
Pity you dont have one to display
Another advantage after the fact, was the gull wing allowed for more survivable ditching into the sea?
Another document on the subject researched using Vought files and interviewing Vought engineers.
Brewster also manufactured them and got a pretty poor rating for their quality of work..
View more comments